AI Transparency
AI may support the work. It does not replace judgment.
AI tools can help with drafts, organization, editing, formatting, and maintenance. They will not be treated as authors, sources, or moral cover.
Civic media asks for trust. That means being clear about how the work is made, what tools may be involved, and where the limits are.
AI output can be incomplete, misleading, biased, poorly sourced, or wrong, especially around politics and public life. This project will not pretend otherwise.
What AI may help with
- Drafting and reorganizing human-reviewed copy.
- Editing for clarity, structure, accessibility, and formatting.
- Summarizing research notes for human review.
- Maintaining static site code, components, and documentation.
What AI will not do
- It will not impersonate voters, volunteers, candidates, readers, or grassroots support.
- It will not be used for private voter targeting or manipulative personalization.
- It will not publish factual political claims without sourcing and human review.
- It will not be treated as a source, author, or substitute for accountability.
Human review and sourcing
Public-facing civic copy should be human-reviewed before publishing. Values-based essays and moral arguments can move quickly when they do not depend on unsupported factual claims. Claims about candidates, elections, polling, laws, public records, allegations, voting deadlines, policy, or current events need sources before publication. The Source Library explains how sources are selected and labeled.
Corrections and contact
If you see an error in public copy, email hello@nobodyownsyourvote.com. Corrections should be direct, visible, and proportionate to the mistake.
Why this matters
Nobody Owns Your Vote is built around voter agency. It would be hypocritical to tell voters to question power while hiding the tools, shortcuts, or limits behind this project. Transparency is part of the standard.